Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Issue whether Respondent have floated dummy companies to claim separate SSI exemption – Held that as the issue already stand settled in favour of the Respondent and in the present case, no fresh investigation has been carried out, only the earlier proceeding of the aforesaid case has been followed, Hence Revenue appeal dismissed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
28-Jan-2023 11:21:38
Order date: 25 January, 2023
Parties: C.C.E. & S.T.-RAJKOT vs KICH INDUSTRIES
Facts:
- The Respondent, KICH INDUSTRIES, was alleged to have floated dummy firms/ companies, therefore, the value of the aforesaid firm/ companies is clubbable in the clearance value of the Respondent M/s Kich Industries. Accordingly, separate SSI Exemption to all the dummy units are not applicable.
- Learned Commissioner (appeals) dropped the demand by allowing the appeal of the respondent on the ground that for the earlier period this Tribunal in the appellant’s case as reported at 2013 Kich Industries vs Commissioner of Central Excise-Rajkot, has held that all the units are separate and clearance value of those units cannot be clubbed with the respondent.
- Therefore, the revenue filed this appeal.
Issue:
- Whether the various firms and companies are dummy firms/companies of the respondent?
Order:
- The Tribunal observed that for the earlier period after detailed investigation and relying of various evidences, the adjudicating authority had confirmed the demand clubbing the clearance value of all other alleged dummy firms/ companies in the clearance value of the respondent. The same was challenged before this Tribunal, this Tribunal vide judgment reported at Kich Industries (supra) allowed the appeal of the respondent. In the present case, no fresh investigation has been carried out, only the earlier proceeding of the aforesaid case has been followed.
- Accordingly, there is no infirmity in the impugned order passed by Learned Commissioner (Appeals). Hence, the same is upheld. Revenue’s appeal is dismissed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation