Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: It is not in dispute that when the amount was paid during investigation no formal protest was launched at the time of the said deposit – Hence, payments made by the petitioner were in the nature of excise duty and were not deposits even when the demand is set aside; Refund not allowed as the same time barred as per the provisions of Section 11B –Appeal dismissed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
10-Dec-2022 14:54:07
Order date – 08 December 2022
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s. John Energy Ltd. certain investigation was initiated against them and during investigation, they paid the service tax.
- The tribunal on the ground of limitation set aside the demand, consequently the appellant filed refund claim. The said refund claim was rejected by the lower authorities on the ground of limitation.
Issue –
- Whether the refund claim can be rejected on the ground of limitation?
Order –
- The Tribunal finds that it is not in dispute that when the amount was paid during investigation no formal protest was launched at the time of the said deposit. It is also not in dispute that duty was otherwise leviable and it was not a tax collected under mistake of law or unconstitutionally. It is also not in dispute that refund claim has been filed beyond the period of limitation prescribed under Section 11B.
- The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Ajni Interiors - 2019 (9) TMI 529, the payments made by the petitioner were in the nature of excise duty and were not deposits, the provisions of Section 11B of the Act would be attracted.
- Relying on the decision of Hon’ble High Court in the case of AJNI INTERIORS (supra) which has been approved by Hon’ble Apex Court, the appeal is dismissed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation