Service Tax – Cestat Chennai: Appellant has not collected anything other than the actuals freight charges, which is clear from the invoices placed along with the appeal memorandum – In SCN also there is no allegations against the appellant as to the collection of any charges over and above the actuals, hence demand not sustainable – Appeal allowed [Order attached]
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
26-Aug-2023 15:49:47
Order Date – 18 August 2023
Parties: M/s. Jetway Forwarders Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s. Jetway Forwarders Private Limited is rendering services as a Custom House Agent (CHA).
- It appeared to the Revenue that the appellant had collected freight charges for transportation of goods by road. Accordingly a Show Cause Notice dated 16.06.2011 was issued wherein it was proposed, inter alia, to demand Service Tax on the GTA services allegedly rendered by the appellant.
- The Additional Commissioner proceeded to confirm the demand, as proposed, along with appropriate interest under Section 75 ibid. and penalties under Sections 77 and 78 ibid.
Issue –
- Whether the Department was right in demanding Service Tax on the alleged GTA services from the appellant?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that for the subsequent period, vide in Order-in-Appeal No. 159/2017 (STA-I) dated 28.03.2017, the first appellate authority has accepted the fact that the appellant had only collected the freight charges which were merely reimbursement and without any margin.
- Thus, in the case on hand, admittedly, the appellant has not collected anything other than the actuals, which is clear from the invoices placed along with the appeal memorandum. Even from the Show Cause Notice there is no allegations against the appellant as to the collection of any charges over and above the actuals.
- Hence, in view of the fact that a similar demand has been dropped by the first appellate authority although for a different period, the demand is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation