Service Tax – Cestat Chennai: Providing cellular / mobile services to a subscriber during ‘international outbound roaming’ relates to telecommunication service not exigible to service tax at the hands of the appellant under RCM as the service is provided by not a ‘telegraph authority’ – Appeal dismissed [Order attached]
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
24-Oct-2023 22:15:13
Order Date – 10 October 2023
Parties: M/s. Vodafone Idea Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s. Vodafone Idea Ltd. tied up with foreign mobile operators for international outbound roaming. The foreign mobile operators charges the appellant for the said service and in turn the appellant charged their customers for the said services.
- A Show Cause Notice was issued to the appellant proposing to demand service tax with interest and for imposition of penalty alleging that international outbound roaming services which appeared to be taxable under ‘Business Auxiliary Service’ (BAS).
- The adjudicating authority confirmed the allegations in the Show Cause Notice.
Issue –
- Whether the international outbound roaming services are taxable under BAS?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that the majority order makes it clear that in the case of international inbound roaming the FTO is the person who is legally entitled to receive the service of the HNO as per the agreement, even though the beneficiary is the customer/ subscriber of FTO in the taxable territory. Hence it was held that during international outbound roaming outside the taxable territory the HNO is the service recipient of the services provided by the FTO and not the HNO’s subscribers/ customers.
- The activity of providing cellular / mobile connectivity from outside the country to a subscriber of a HNO during ‘international outbound roaming’, relates to ‘telecommunication service’.
- Although the activity of providing cellular / mobile services to a subscriber during ‘international outbound roaming’ relates to telecommunication service, however the said services provided by any person who is not a ‘telegraph authority’, as in the present case, the activity would not be a taxable service as defined by section 65(109a) and is hence not exigible to service tax at the hands of the appellant under RCM.
- The appeal succeeds and is disposed of accordingly.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation