Service Tax – Cestat Chennai: SCN is not to be issued when the assessee has paid the Service Tax along with interest - There is no evidence that the appellant had suppressed facts to evade tax as they accounted the amounts received – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
09-Mar-2023 21:09:41
Order Date – 07 March 2023
Parties: M/s. Servocraft HR Solutions Private Limited Vs The Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s. Servocraft HR Solutions Private Limited, on being pointed out by the audit group, paid the amount of Service Tax along with interest for the period from August 2010 to October 2010 which was not paid within due date.
- Show Cause Notice dated 26.09.2011 was issued, proposing to demand for the period from August 2010 to October 2010 along with interest and for imposing penalties Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.
Issue –
- Whether the penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the appellant are legal and proper?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that sub-section (3) of Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 provides that no Show Cause Notice is to be issued when the assessee has paid the Service Tax along with interest. It is not dispute that the appellant had paid the Service Tax along with interest on being pointed out by the audit group.
- Also, the appellant has accounted the amounts received by them as well as the details of transactions. An assessee who has suppressed figures in their account or issued parallel invoices so as to evade the payment of tax will not be covered under sub-section (3) of Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994. As already stated, apart from a vague allegation, there is no evidence that the appellant has suppressed facts with the intent to evade payment of tax.
- Thus, it was held that the penalties imposed are unwarranted and impugned order is modified to the extent of setting aside the penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation