Service Tax – Cestat Chennai: Service tax is not leviable on liquidated damages since neither the appellant is carrying on any activity to receive compensation nor can there be any intention of the other party to breach or violate the contract and suffer a loss – Appeal allowed. [Order dated – 22 September 2022]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
24-Sep-2022 10:50:41
Order date – 22 September 2022
Facts –
- The Assesse, M/s. GKN Driveline India Limited, filed an appeal against the Order-in-Appeal dated 06.04.2022 passed by the Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise (Appeals-II), Chennai.
- The issue involved in the present case is regarding the demand of service tax on liquidated damages.
- The appellant submitted that the issue is no more res integra as the same is decided in the case of M/s. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax & Anr., Cestat Chennai.
Issues –
- Whether the Revenue was justified in demanding Service Tax on liquidated damages under Section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994?
Order –
- Relying on the case M/s. South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Raipur, The Tribunal held that the recovery of liquidated damages/penalty from other party cannot be said to be towards any service per se, since neither the appellant is carrying on any activity to receive compensation nor can there be any intention of the other party to breach or violate the contract and suffer a loss.
- Therefore, the order of demand doesn’t sustain and the impugned order is set aside.
- Hence, the appeal is allowed with consequential benefits.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation