Service Tax – Cestat Kolkata: If the documents provide necessary particulars as required under Rule 4A, merely because the documents are not invoices but are debit notes the refund cannot be denied at the end of the service recipient – Appeal Allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
17-Jan-2023 17:04:27
Order Date – 12 January 2023
Parties: M/s. Pragati Agri Products Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX, Kolkata North Commissionerate
Facts –
- The Appellant , M/s. Pragati Agri Products Private Limited, filed a refund, which was rejected on the ground that debit notes issued by M/s. Marine Containter Services (India) Pvt.Ltd., which is improper documents and are accordingly inadmissible under Notification No.41/2012-ST dated 29.03.2012 read with Rule 4A(1) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994.
Issue –
- Whether the refund is inadmissible on debit note issued by M/s. Marine Containter Services (India) Pvt.Ltd?
Order –
- The Tribunal held that Notification No.41/2012-ST dated 29.03.2012 stipulates the manner in which the rebate shall be claimed. In the present case, the debit notes duly fulfilled all the necessary conditions as are required to be provided, but the fact remains that the said documents are not invoices, bills or challans, but are debit notes.
- The issue is no more res integra and the Tribunal in the case of SRF Ltd. has held as the documents reveal that they contain all the details as required under Rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. If the documents provide these necessary particulars, merely because the documents are debit notes the refund cannot be denied at the end of the service recipient.
- Therefore the impugned order cannot be sustained. The Appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation