Service Tax – Cestat Kolkata: Issue of classification – Commissioner himself taking note of the fact that the construction service is inclusive of supply of goods has excluded the value of goods for raising demand of service tax, hence the Appellants are not providers of “commercial or industrial construction services” but of “work contract services” [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
10-Aug-2022 03:29:25
Order Date: 8 August 2022
Facts-
- The Appellant, M/s. Simplex Projects Limited has undertaken construction of accommodation for urban employed youth & women vendors, in terms of the contracts awarded by M/s. National Building Construction Corporation Limited (NBCC) on behalf of the Ministry of Urban Development & Poverty Alleviation, Govt. of India.
- The Show Cause Notice was issued which has been adjudicated by the Ld. Commissioner vide Order-in-Original confirming the demand of Service tax along with penalty under the category of ‘Commercial or Industrial Construction Services’.
- Being aggrieved the appellants filed this appeal.
Issue-
- Whether the demand of Service tax under the category of Commercial or Industrial Construction is sustainable?
Order-
- The Tribunal observed that the issue can be decided on the point of classification alone. The contract is inclusive of supply of goods. The Ld. The Commissioner while taking note of the fact that the construction service is inclusive of supply of goods has extended the benefits of abatement to exclude the value of goods so as to arrive at the assessable value for raising demand of Service tax.
- The Tribunal relied in the case of URC Construction (P) Ltd. vs. CCE, Salem 2017 (50) S.T.R. 147 (Tri -Chennai) and various other cases wherein the same issue has been already examined and it was held that appellant are not providers of 'commercial or industrial construction service' but of ‘works contract service', no tax is liable on construction contracts executed prior to 1st June 2007.
- Since the issue is no longer res-Integra, the demand of Service tax under the category of commercial or industrial construction cannot be sustained and hence, set aside.
- The appeals are allowed with consequential relief.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation