Service Tax – Cestat New Delhi: Non-payment of tax under RCM towards renting of immovable property (office) to Director is a revenue neutral situation as Credit would have been available, hence demand is liable to set aside; As returns were filed prior to issue of show cause notice hence penalty under extended period cannot be invoked – Appeal allowed [Order attached]
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
17-Jan-2023 14:34:08
Order Date – 16 January 2023
Parties: M/s Varaha Infra Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST, Jodhpur
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s Varaha Infra Limited is engaged in providing taxable services under works contract etc.
- A show cause notice was issued alleging that appellant have not paid service tax of Rs. 2,90,628/- under RCM of renting of immovable property (office) in respect of rent charges paid to its Director. Also the appellant have done repair and maintenance work but have claimed higher abatement of 60% available for new work and liable to penalty for late filing of ST-3 Returns and is also liable to pay interest on delayed payment of service tax.
Issue –
- Whether the demands raised in show cause notice is in order?
Order –
- The Tribunal held that demand have been confirmed on payment of rent for office to Director of the Company during the period April 2014 to June 2017. The demand have been raised by invoking the extended period of limitation, on reverse charge basis vide SCN dated 13/07/2020. The situation is wholly neutral, this ground is allowed and the demand is set aside.
- As regards to availment of 60% abatement, it was observed that the appellant have done execution of new work after removing the existing structure and railing etc. Hence the demand is also set aside.
- Further, prior to issue of show cause notice dated13.07.2020 appellant have admittedly filed the service tax returns, about two years prior to it in the year 2018. Hence the quantum of penalty to Rs. 2000 per return or a total penalty of Rs. 6000/- under Section 77 r/w Rule 7C of Service Tax Rules.
- Interest under Section 75 is payable for delayed payment of service tax, as such tax has not been paid by the due date or within the prescribed period. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation