Service tax – Cestat New Delhi: Question of unjust enrichment in respect to the refund claim – Held that appellant has only borne the burden of tax, as it does not make any difference whether the amount is debited in the profit and loss account or it is shown as amount receivable on the asset side in the balance sheet, in either case the burden falls on the appellant-assessee only – Appeal allowed by way of refund [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
16-Nov-2022 19:28:13
Order date – 10 November 2022
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s Krishnakunj Developers Pvt Ltd, is a builder /developer who constructs dwelling Unit/Apartment for sale. The appellant is registered with the department for providing service under the head construction of residential complex service, man power supply service and works contract service, etc.
- Audit objection was raised that the appellant have not paid service tax on the amount received from the buyers of the flat/units towards society membership fee. Accordingly a show-cause notice was issued on 18/05/2017 for demanding the service tax with interest and penalty.
- The appellant deposit the same and filed an refund request claiming that the demand as per audit objection is not tenable, as such amount was collected as the trustee of the flats/unit buyers, which is to be passed on to the RWA or society of flat owners once it is constituted. The revenue rejected the refund claim.
- Being aggrieve, the appellant had filed an appeal
Issue –
- Whether the service tax along with interest and penalty can be refunded?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that the appellant have not passed on the burden of tax to any third person or to the buyer of the flats. In the facts and circumstance, it is the appellant who has borne the burden of tax. It does not make any difference whether the amount is debited in the profit and loss account or it is shown as amount receivable on the asset side in the balance sheet, in either case the burden falls on the appellant-assessee only.
- Hence the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation