Trending
GST – Karnataka High Court: Order invoking Section 86A by blocking of electronic credit ledger does... GST – Karnataka High Court: The GST Council having recommended the extension of period of limitation... GST – Supreme Court: If construction of a building was essential for carrying out the activity of su... GST – Madras High Court: Since Appeal is filed in 14 days after the limitation expired, the delay is...

Top Stories

Excise – Cestat New Delhi: The liability to pay presumptive amount of reversal under Rule 57CC arises only for final product and not for waste; Duty cannot be demanded on the parts of the old plant, as these are not manu...
Excise – Cestat New Delhi: As no reasonable explanation in the impugned order and also in the previous order of this Tribunal were there, whereby the clandestine removal of finished goods been alleged, hence no penalty...
Customs – Cestat Mumbai: Antenna since parts of BTS, as held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Hutchison Essar South Ltd.'s case, cannot be considered as a 'machine' hence to be classified as "parts" under Tariff Item 8517.70....
Excise – Cestat New Delhi: As the appellant had purchased the entire unit, as is clear from the MOU itself and the agreement for transfer is for entire industrial property, which comprised plant and machinery also, hence...
Service tax - Cestat Chennai: Time line to file refund claim ought to be computed from the date of original submission of the refund claim and not the date of resubmitting the claim after rectifying the documents – Appea...
Service tax - Cestat Mumbai – Refund of accumulated Cenvat credit cannot be denied on the argument that Appellant has not undertaken exports as they had themselves conducted ‘clinical trials’ on goods supplied to holding...
Customs - Cestat New Delhi- In absence of sufficient evidence to support the RSP was mis-declared and that the loose labels sold in the market at higher prices, the rejection of RSP, redetermination of duty, confiscation...
GST - Maharashtra AAAR: The amount reimbursed by the government to the Appellant is in the nature of subsidy, hence the reimbursement of expenses amount cannot be construed as "consideration", accordingly grant received...
Excise – Cestat Mumbai: Wherever the assessee is liable to pay lesser amount than agreed price as a result of a price variation clause in the agreement on account of liability to “liquidated damages”, irrespective of whe...
GST - Rajasthan High Court: Revenue contention that application for cancellation of registration was made in FORM GST REG-29 and not in FORM GST REG-16 cannot debar the Petitioner to link the GSTIN of his father’s firm w...
Service tax - Cestat New Delhi: It is a settled law that the demand proposed under a particular category under SCN cannot be confirmed under a different category in the Order; Service tax on consulting engineer service s...
Service tax - Cestat New Delhi: As the appellant have received the service with supporting invoices and payment made through bank transfer is evident from the copy of ledger account, thus, the genuineness of the transact...

News Updates

Get in Touch

info@taxrealtime.in

+91 7291044154

+91 7849813442

Useful Links

Issue under GST?

About us Terms of use Privacy policy Career Advertise with us Contact us

Copyright © Taxrealtime. All Rights Reserved