Top GST News, Case Laws & Circulars | Taxrealtime

TAX REAL TIME

QUICK TAX SOLUTIONS

Register Sign in |

Trending Now

Kerala High Court: Under amended GST law, goods detained for confiscation under Section 130 cannot b... GST - Orissa High Court: Refund of tax paid twice (by cash ledger as well as credit ledger) under a... Gauhati High Court: SCN for FY 2020–21, issued on 29.11.2024 (annual return due date: 28.02.2022), i... GSTN has launched Form GST REG-32 on the portal to enable eligible taxpayers registered under Rule 1...

Top Stories

GST – Rajasthan High Court: The issue regarding demand of GST on royalty paid to Mining Department has already been decided by this Court in Sudershan Lal Gupta’s case wherein it was held that royalty being “consideratio...

FTP – Public Notice issued for amnesty scheme for one-time settlement of default in export obligation by Advance and EPCG authorization holders [Public Notice attached]

Service Tax – New Delhi High Court: Proceedings for adjudication of the SCN, after the lapse of almost 13 years are inordinately delayed and it is now impermissible for the respondents to continue the same – Appeal allow...

Excise – Cestat New Delhi: There is no condition that the brand which has been advertised should have been owned by the assessee availing CENVAT credit, hence CENVAT on advertising services are rightly availed – Appeal...

Service Tax – Cestat New Delhi: Liquidated damages recovered on account of breach or non-performance of contract are not leviable to service tax; Right to use natural resource was not taxable prior to 01.04.2016 – Appeal...

GST – AAR Karnataka: Wooden ice cream sticks and wooden ice cream spoons merit classification under HSN code 4419.90.90, exigible to GST @ 12% [Order attached]

Service Tax – Punjab and Haryana High Court: Reasonable period to decide the SCN is 5 years – As the instant SCN is decided after the expiry of 5 years from the date of notice, hence is liable to set aside – Writ petitio...

Service Tax – Cestat New Delhi: It cannot be said that the license fee is quid pro quo for any support offered by the Railways - As the consideration paid is not linked with support service, Service tax cannot be demande...

Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Club and club members are not different entity, service provided by the club to its members does not fall under the provision of Service, hence Service tax not leviable on short term accom...

Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Commissioner (Appeals) has indeed power to remand the matter as held by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mil India Limited vs. CCE, Noida- 2007 (210) ELT 188 (SC) - Revenue appeal dismissed...

Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Foreclosure charges are not liable to service tax; Penalty/penal charges are not chargeable to service tax as the same are not ‘consideration’ – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Service Tax – Cestat Chandigarh: When the payment is made on provisional basis the amount sometime is paid in excess and sometime it may be less, it is not the case of short payment in any case but it is only an adjustme...

‹ Previous Page

News Updates

Get complete access to news updates - @299 + GST for 6 months / @499 + GST for 1 Year

Get in Touch

info@taxrealtime.in

+91 7291044154

+91 7849813442