Custom – Cestat Mumbai: As the appellant is unable to evince due to discharge of obligation, considering the nature of lapse on the part of the ‘customs broker’, it is directed to forfeit the security deposit and impose penalty [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
26-Dec-2022 20:19:51
Order date – 22 December 2022
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s Sonak Shipping Services, had cleared goods imported by their clients, M/s Pratibha Traders, said to be ‘needles’ as per bill of entry.
- It was alleged that goods are subject to ‘anti-dumping duty’ leviable under Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and which amounts to breach of regulation 10(a), 10(b), 10(d), 10(e), 10(m) and 10(n) of Customs Broker Licensing Regulation, 2018
Issue –
- Whether the appellant violated regulation 10(a), 10(b), 10(d), 10(e), 10(m) and 10(n) of Customs Broker Licensing Regulation, 2018 or not?
Order –
- The Tribunal held that the enquiry proceedings restricted itself to the technical aspect of the allegation without endeavouring to ascertain if acts of omission or commission as ‘custom broker’ had, in fact, contributed to the act of smuggling. The appellant has, at the same time, been unable to evince due to discharge of obligation.
- The licensing authority has revoked the licence of the appellant herein besides forfeiting the security deposit and imposing further penalty. Considering the nature of lapse on the part of the ‘customs broker’, the ends of justice would be met by setting aside the revocation while allowing the forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty to sustain.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation