Customs – Cestat Ahmedabad: Refund of duty paid twice on account of technical glitch - Held that refund allowed as lack of diligence is not indicated on the face of record – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
16-Dec-2023 22:22:45
Order Date – 13 December 2023
Parties: Esdee Paints Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs, Kandla
Facts –
- The Appellant, Esdee Paints Limited, paid customs duty on 12.10.2012. However due to some technical glitch the appellant could not generate receipt and therefore appellant made another attempt on the same date and later both the receipts were generated.
- The appellant sought refund of excess amount paid on the basis of Chartered Accountant certificate, filed refund application on 02.05.2014. The same was found to be beyond the period of limitation prescribed under Section 27 of Customs Act, 1962.
Issue –
- Whether the appellant is entitled to refund of excess amount paid due to technical glitch
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that Hon’ble Gujarat High Court considered two years a reasonable period when the duty was paid by mistake.
- Further in the present case the payment was made twice due to technical glitch in the Customs payment system. The appellants to file refund pursued the matter with bank to get confirmation of double payment, as well as taking certification from Chartered Accountant on the basis of accounts to indicate such double payment and therefore, lack of diligence is not indicated on the face of record.
- The Appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation