Customs – Cestat Chennai: As the PSI certificate issued by the Branch was subsequently ratified by the DGFT, which is complete in all respect, hence there is no violation of import - Redemption fine and penalty under Section 112(a) of the Act not to be demanded – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
19-Jan-2023 13:59:15
Order Date – 18 January 2023
Parties: M/s. ARS Steels & Alloy International Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Commissioner of Customs, Chennai-II Commissionerate
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s. ARS Steels & Alloy International Pvt. Ltd., filed Bill-of-Entry for clearance of goods declared as ‘Heavy Melting Scrap’.
- It was found that the Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI) Certificate furnished by it was not as per Appendix-28 of the Foreign Trade Policy, and redemption of the goods in lieu of confiscation was allowed on payment of redemption fine and that a penalty was also imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962.
Issue –
- Whether the PSI certificate submitted by the appellant-importer was a sufficient compliance with Appendix-28 ibid?
Order –
- The Hon’ble High Court held that the PSI certificate which was furnished was complete in all respects, except the fact that the same was issued by the Branch Office. This implies that the Revenue has recognized and accepted the Branch Office of the issuing agent, but does not want to accept the certificate issued by the Branch
- It is clear that there is no violation as alleged, more so because the PSI certificate issued by the Branch was subsequently ratified by the DGFT (as reflected in paragraph 25 of the Order-in-Original), which serves the purpose.
- The authorities haven’t found any improper importation of the goods resulting in confiscation of the same. This, ipso facto, therefore, would not tantamount to improper import of goods within the meaning of Section 111(d) of the Act. Consequently, the authorities below are not justified in demanding redemption fine and penalty under Section 112(a) of the Act.
- Hence the appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation