Customs - Cestat Mumbai: Case cannot be remanded back by Commissioner (A) limited to a specific purpose, instead can be remanded back to examine all the issues involved in appeal and decide the matter after giving opportunity of personal hearing - Appeal allowed [Attached order dated 26 August 2022]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
28-Aug-2022 08:30:55
Order Date: 26 August 2022
Facts-
- The Appellant, M/s V.K. Impex had imported Cut Orchid Flowers in various varieties and colours and filed Bills of Entry before the jurisdictional Customs authorities, for release of the same.
- The Department entertained a view that the flowers were undervalued. Since the fresh flowers were perishable in nature, the appellant had deposited the extra duty demanded by the Department and cleared the consignment.
- In this case, the proper officer did not pass any speaking order in respect of the clearance of the consignments in terms of Section 17 of the Customs Act, 1962. Upon payment of the duty on the basis of Kachcha Bills of Entry, the appellants had filed the appeals before the learned Commissioner (Appeals).
- Commissioner (Appeals) held that the Department had sufficient reason to reject the declared value, however, vide the impugned orders, the cases of the appellants were remanded to the adjudicating authority for observing the principles of natural justice.
- The appellants contended that remand should not be limited to the specific issue but should be the open one keeping all issues open for consideration by the lower authority.
Issue-
- Whether the issue decided by authority is proper and justified?
Order-
- The Tribunal observed that there is force in the submissions of the appellants that the scope of deciding the issue on merits by learned Commissioner (Appeals) is not proper and justified. Thus, the Tribunal considered the view that the paragraph 11 in the impugned order, wherein the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has decided the merits of the case should be set aside.
- Since the matter has been remanded by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) to the adjudicating authority for deciding certain issues afresh, in the view that while considering the overall merits of the case, the original authority should also examine the issue dealt with by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned orders.
- Therefore, instead of remanding the matter, limited to specific issues, it is an open remand for deciding all the issues involved in these appeals.
- The Tribunal held that all the appeals are allowed by way of remand to the original authority.
Tags
##GST #Customs
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation