Customs – Cestat New Delhi: Wrong claim of export benefit under MEIS is due to mis-advised by the CHA, however, appellant is responsible to understand the eligibility and the conditions before making a claim for the export benefits – Liable for redemption fine and penalty but at reduced rare – Appeal partly allowed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
11-Jan-2023 17:23:29
Order Date – 10 January 2023
Parties: M/s Cipra Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Customs- (Export), New Delhi
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s Cipra Enterprises, filed Shipping Bill for export of ‘Blood Glucose Test Strips’ and ‘Freestyle Sensor’ under MEIS scheme.
- On investigation it appeared to Revenue that the Appellant had mis-declared the ‘Country of Origin’ in the export document so as to claim the export incentives under MEIS. The classification of Blood Glucose Test Strips was mis-declared as CTH 30069100 instead of the correct CTH 38220090.
- Accordingly disallowed the MEIS benefit and ordered confiscation of the goods with an option to redeem the goods on payment of fine, also imposed penalty.
Issue –
- Whether the confiscation of the goods and penalty imposed under Section 114(iii) and redemption fine are in order?
Order –
- The Tribunal held that the appellant made a wrong claim of export benefit under MEIS, being mis-advised by the CHA. However, it was the responsibility of the appellant to understand the eligibility and the conditions before making a claim for the export benefits.
- It was also held that the goods were not prohibited goods, and the fine and penalty are on the higher side. Accordingly, the Redemption fine is reduced from Rs. 4 lakhs to Rs. 1 lakh and Penalty under Section 114(iii) is reduced from Rs. 50,000/- to Rs. 25,000/-.
- Hence the appeal is partly allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation