Excise – Cestat Ahmadabad: Issue in availment of option of reversal of credit when supplying both dutiable and exempted goods – Held that giving options for availing a particular option is procedural requirement and on failure of the same, the assessee cannot be deprived of choosing any of the option available in Rule 6(3) and one of the option is reversal of proportionate credit – Hence, the appellant’s excess reversal of 5% is required to be refunded/recredit - Appeal allowed [Order attached].

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
26-Jan-2023 11:09:43
Order date: 23 January 2023
Parties: JINDAL PHOTO A DIVISION OF JINDAL POLYFILMS LTD. Vs C.C.E. & S.T.- VAPI
Facts:
- The Appellant, M/s Jindal Photo A Division Of Jindal Polyfilms Ltd., are engaged in the manufacture of photographic paper, X-ray and Colour Roll films falling under chapter 37. Their final product was exempted from the whole of excise duty. The appellant reversed cenvat credit from their RG 23A Part II account towards amount equal to 5% of the value of the exempted clearances made on 27.06.2011.
- Subsequently, the appellant reversed total amount of duty from their R.G.23A part II account against the raw material in their stock and chose the second option of non-payment of duty and to maintain separate account as provided in Rule 6 of CCR.
- The appellant filed an application before the Deputy Commissioner seeking permission to retake credit of wrongly reversed said amount. In the department's view the amount was correctly reversed as the option once exercised to reverse amount in terms of Rule 6 cannot be changed during the financial year after that the Show Cause Notice was issued to the appellant and after due process of law which got rejected and declined permission of re-credit/ refund.
Issue
- Whether the Appellant is entitled for recredit/ refund which was mistakenly reversed?
Order
- The Tribunal observed that from the provision of the Rule 11(3) that in case of any dutiable goods became exempted, the assessee is required to reverse the cenvat credit in respect of inputs lying in stock or in process or is contained in the final product as of date of opting for the exemption notification.
- The appellant has mistakenly reversed 5% in terms of Rule 6(3)(i) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. On realising this mistake, they have reversed on input and contained in the finished goods by following the Rule 11(3) they have corrected the mistake, therefore, the amount @ 5% of exempted finished goods reversed by the appellant became excess reversal, hence the same is liable to be recredited/ refunded to the appellant.
- Hence the appellant is entitled for recredit/ refund and interest thereupon, if any, as per law. The impugned order is set aside
- Appeal is allowed with consequential relief.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation