Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: As defence and documents in support of appellant’s claim has not been examined, hence the demand on this count cannot be sustained – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
23-Dec-2022 18:06:20
Order Date – 22 December 2022
Facts –
- The Appellant, BASF (India) Limited (BIL) is engaged in managing goods falling under Chapter 39 to First Schedule of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and availed cenvat credit of service tax during setting up of the factory.
- A show cause notice issued denying cenvat credit for the services in relation to the fabrication of plant and machinery in the factory and making plant and machinery operational during setting up of the factor (April 2011 to March 2016).
Issue –
- Whether the appellant is eligible for cenvat credit of the service tax paid?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that the exclusion clause in the definition of input service would obviously make such services ineligible for the cenvat credit under the head of ‘Input Service’. It is seen that the appellant has claimed that they have on their own not availed such credits relating to the exclusion clause.
- It was found that it is apparent that the defence and documents in support of appellant’s claim has not been examined. In view of above, the Tribunal find that demand on this count cannot be sustained as the order fails to examine the defence given by the appellant.
- The Tribunal held that on the issue of the credit of input services availed in respect of alleged ‘setting up of the factory’ as well as the suggestion of the appellant about the credit not availed on account of exclusion clause, the matter needs to be examined again by the original adjudicating authority.
- Hence the appeal is remanded back to the original adjudicating authority.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation