Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Penalty is not payable by the employee Director of the Company as he neither availed Cenvat credit nor is the beneficiary of Cenvat credit – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
25-Mar-2023 15:16:13
Order Date – 24 March 2023
Parties: Shri Pranatharthiharan Sridharan Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Vadodara-I
Facts –
- The Appellant, Shri Pranatharthiharan Sridharan, is an employee Director in the Company namely M/s. Diamond Power Transformers Limited. Penalty was imposed under Section 15(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 on the appellant on the ground that he was overall in-charge and involved in the fraudulent availment of Cenvat credit.
Issue –
- Whether the appellant is liable to pay penalty under section 15(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that from the plain reading of Rule 15(1), a person shall be liable to penalty who takes or utilize Cenvat credit in respect of input or capital goods or input services wrongly or in contravention of any of the provisions of these Rules.
- In the facts of the present case, it is M/s. Diamond Power Transformers Limited who has availed fraudulent Cenvat credit, the appellant being employee Director has not availed Cenvat credit for himself therefore, Rule 15(1) is not applicable on the person who has neither availed Cenvat credit nor is the beneficiary of Cenvat credit.
- Accordingly, penalty under Rule 15(1) was wrongly imposed on the appellant. The appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation