Excise – Cestat Chandigarh: Nothing emerges from the impugned order that the appellant have not filed the requisite returns with intent to evade the payment of tax; Imposition of penalties is not sustainable – Appeal allowed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
01-Mar-2024 06:16:02
Order Date – 22 February 2024
Parties: M/s Vinayak Industries Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Jammu
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s Vinayak Industries, are engaged in the manufacture of ‘Tin Containers’. During the course of internal audit conducted by the Department, it was found that the appellant have not filed returns namely ER-4, ER-5, ER-6 and ER-7 for the period from February 2012 to March 2016.
- Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the appellant on 23.04.2018 proposing to impose penalties. After following the due process, the Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demand of penalties.
Issue –
- Whether the imposition of penalty for non filing returns are proper?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that in the present case the period involved is February 2012 to March 2016, whereas the show cause notice was issued on 23.04.2018 which is beyond the period of limitation. In fact, neither in the show cause notice nor in the impugned order, the grounds for invoking the extended period of limitation have been discussed.
- Nothing emerges from the impugned order that the appellant have not filed the requisite returns with intent to evade the payment of tax. Hence it was held that the imposition of penalties is not sustainable and the appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation