Excise – Cestat Chandigarh: When process undertaken by the assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then the CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty – Appeal allowed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
01-Mar-2024 06:16:58
Order Date – 22 February 2024
Parties: M/s Sandeep Laminators Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s Sandeep Laminators Pvt. Ltd., are engaged in the manufacture of ‘Plastic Laminates’. The appellants are availing CENVAT credit on capital goods and inputs under Rule 3 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
- Two show cause notices were issued disallowing the CENVAT credit alleging that laminating/ metallising of duty paid does not amount to manufacture as no new and distinct products comes into existence.
Issue –
- Whether CENVAT credit is available on laminating/ metallising of duty paid?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that the issue involved in the present case is no more res integra and has been consistently held by various decisions of the Tribunal, upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and High Court that when process undertaken by the assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then the CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed.
- In view of the ratios of various decisions and by following the ratio of the said decisions, it was held that the impugned order is not sustainable in law and the appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation