Excise – Cestat Kolkata: Dispute in availment of Cenvat credit due to invoices do not mention credit registration number of the consignee, registration number of the carrier vehicle – Held that substantive benefit cannot be denied due to procedural lapse, as it is undisputed that goods were received at factory and excise duty was paid on goods; SCN was issued on the basis of audit of records maintained by the Appellant, therefore extended period cannot be invoked - Appeal Allowed [Order Attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
22-Jan-2023 14:52:50
Order date- 20 January 2023
Parties- M/s. S.L. Polypack Private Limited vs Commissioner of CGST & CX, Howrah Commissionerate
Facts -
- The Appellant, M/s. S.L. Polypack Private Limited, is a manufacturer of Plastic Cups and Plastic Plates falling under Tariff Item No.39231090 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. During the period 2007-08 and 2008-09, the Appellant had received some inputs under the cover of input invoices issued by M/s. L.G. Polymers India Ltd.
- Show Cause Notice was issued on 01.08.2013 on the allegation that invoices do not mention credit registration number of the consignee, registration number of the carrier vehicle and delivery of the goods was made at a place other than the factory.
- It is the case of the Revenue that credit was taken on the basis of ineligible documents which resulted in contravention of Rule 9 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
Issue -
- Whether the Appellant has correctly availed Cenvat Credit?
Order -
- Tribunal observed that it is undisputed that the goods covered under the invoices were actually received at the Appellant’s factory and those goods were used for manufacture of their final products. It is also undisputed that Excise Duty was paid on those goods which are subject matter of the invoices. Hence, credit is correctly availed.
- It was held that the substantive benefit cannot be denied on procedural grounds and accordingly the impugned orders cannot be sustained.
- Further the Show Cause Notice was issued on the basis of audit of records maintained by the Appellant and therefore extended period cannot be invoked by alleging suppression since they are also submitting/filing the statutory returns on a regular basis.
- The Appellants have a strong case on limitation and the Show Cause Notice is barred by limitation.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation