Excise – Cestat Mumbai: Since the Chartered Accountant’s certificate has certified that the appellant has not recovered the duty amount from their customers, the same is not hit by the bar of unjust enrichment – Refund allowed – Appeal allowed [Order attached]
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
20-Oct-2023 16:20:10
Order Date – 18 October 2023
Parties: Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Bhiwandi
Facts –
- The Appellant, Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., was involved in the manufacture of Mineral Water and Aerated Water.
- They had paid excise duty 'under protest' on waste and scrap cleared from their factory from February 2000 to December 2001. Later the said issue was settled in favour of the appellant and they filed refund claim for the duty paid by them under protest.
- Although the adjudicating authority sanctioned the refund however the same was credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund Account on the ground of ‘unjust enrichment’.
Issue –
- Whether the authorities were justified in crediting the refund claim to the Consumer Welfare Fund on the grounds of 'unjust enrichment'?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed it is settled through decisions that when duty had been paid during investigation at the insistence of the department post clearance of the goods, the provisions of unjust enrichment will not apply.
- The Tribunal found that the Chartered Accountant’s certificate supported the stand of the appellant as it mentioned by stating that ‘HCCBL has not received any amount over and above the amount mentioned in the respective Commercial invoices issued by them during the period February, 2000 to November 12, 2001.’
- Since the Chartered Accountant’s certificate has certified that the appellant has not recovered the duty amount from their customers, the same is not hit by the bar of unjust enrichment. The appellant is therefore entitled for refund claimed and the appeal filed by the appellant is accordingly allowed by setting aside the impugned order.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation