Excise – Cestat Mumbai: The issue pertains to refund of Cenvat amount by the appellant in the capacity of a manufacturer, hence Revenue was required to file appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) under section 35A of the Central Excise Act - As Revenue has filed the Appeal filed under Service Tax statute under section 84 of Finance Act in respect of the Central Excise matter, hence the Commissioner (A) Order is set aside – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
21-Jan-2023 02:12:55
Order Date: 9 January 2023
Parties: M/s Coats & Packs Andheri Mumbai VS Commissioner of Central Goods And Service Tax, Mumbai East
Facts -
- The Appellant, M/s Coats & Packs Andheri Mumbai, was issued the show cause notices dated 06.07.2015 and 02.09.2015, seeking recovery of the inadmissible Cenvat Credit under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with the provisions of Section 11A(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
- The said show cause notices were adjudicated upon vide order dated 05.10.2017, in sanctioning the refund in favour of the appellant.
- The issue pertains to refund of Cenvat Credit by the appellant as a manufacturer of excisable goods.
- Thereafter, the impugned order dated 29.11.2018 was passed, wherein the learned Commissioner (Appeals) CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai allowed the appeal in favour of Revenue.
Issue –
- Whether appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994 is maintainable?
Order –
- The Tribunal relied on the case of Guardian Plasticote Ltd wherein it was held that appeal filed under Service Tax statute in respect of the Central Excise matter is not maintainable and accordingly, rejected the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise.
- Hence, Tribunal did not find that the impugned order is sustainable on the ground of maintainability.
- Therefore, the appeal filed by the appellant was allowed on limited ground of jurisdiction only.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation