GST – Allahabad High Court: Denial of second appeal on account of the failure of the appropriate Government to constitute the tribunal - Assessee cannot be faulted for what is essentially a failure of the Government - Directed to deposit 20% of disputed tax liability in addition to earlier deposit of 10% - Writ petition allowed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
05-Jan-2024 18:19:12
Order Date – 12 December 2023
Parties: M/S N.G. Enterprises And Another Vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/S N.G. Enterprises, has assailed the order passed by the first appellate authority under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act as well as the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. The second appeal lies before the appellate tribunal under Section 112 of the respective Acts.
Issue –
- Whether the appeal denied on account of the failure of the appropriate Government to constitute the tribunal is proper and valid?
Order –
- The Single Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that the second aspect which requires to be given weight is that the assessee cannot be faulted for what is essentially a failure of the Government. The statute contemplates deposit of 10% plus 20% of the disputed tax liability before the first and second appellate authorities respectively. By imposing a demand of 50% in these matters, the assessees will be penalized for no fault of theirs. This is the rationale which is borne out from the first set of interim orders rendered in M/S Kent Cables, M/S Tulsi Steels and M/S Nandan Sales Corporation.
- The grant of interim orders in the aforesaid manner made in the said orders passed by this Court balances the interests of revenue as well as the rights of the assessees. However, it needs to be clarified that it is always open to the Court to grant interim orders which are at variance with the aforesaid orders in peculiar facts and circumstances of a particular case while exercising writ jurisdiction in the interests of justice.
- The application for interim relief is finally disposed of with the direction of depositing 20% of the disputed tax liability in addition to the earlier deposit before the assessing authority (which is 10% of the disputed tax amount). Subject to the aforesaid deposit, the recovery proceedings of the balance amount shall remain stayed till the decision of this writ petition.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation