GST – Allahabad High Court: Detention and imposition of penalty as E-way Bill was expired due to a breakdown; Held that there is nothing which indicate any intention to evade tax hence cannot impose penalty – Writ petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
17-Feb-2024 23:17:58
Order Date – 05 February 2024
Parties: M/s Globe Panel Industries India Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of U.P. and Others
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/s Globe Panel Industries India Pvt. Ltd., transported the goods with two e-Invoices and two E-Way Bills. However, due to a breakdown, one of the e-way bills expired, leading to the detention of the goods and imposing penalty.
Issue –
- Whether the detention and imposition of penalty is proper?
Order –
- The Single Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that the goods in the vehicle were for two e-Invoices and two E-Way Bills and only one E-Way Bill had expired. There is no dispute with regard to the consignor and consignee nor any dispute with regard to the description of the goods in the vehicle. In relation to the e-Invoices and the E-Way Bills, the authorities have not been able indicate any intention whatsoever on behalf of the petitioner to evade tax.
- Indubitably, there is a technical violation that has been committed by the petitioner. However, the authorities have not been able to indicate in any manner that the E-Way Bill had been used repeatedly nor have they made out any case with regard to an intention to evade tax by the petitioner. Such a technical violation by itself without any intention to evade tax cannot lead to imposition of penalty under Section 129(3) of the Act.
- The Court directs the respondents to refund the amount of tax and penalty deposited by the petitioner. The writ petition allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation