GST – Allahabad High Court: Mere furnishing of the documents subsequent to the interception cannot be a valid ground to show that there was no intention to evade tax; steps taken by the respondent authorities are proper and in accordance with the law – Writ petition dismissed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
17-Mar-2024 23:08:03
Order Date – 01 March 2024
Parties: M/s Jhansi Enterprises, Nandanpura, Jhansi Vs State of U.P. and Others
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/s Jhansi Enterprises, failed to generate e-way bill at proper time due to non availability of computer operator and was generated after the interception took place with a delay of almost 4 hours after the commencement of transportation of the goods.
- A show cause notice was issued to the petitioner under Section 129(3) of the Act stating that the movement of the goods was in contravention to the provisions of the Act. The demand was confirmed against the petitioner.
Issue –
- Whether the failure to generate e-way bill at proper time will leads to imposition of tax and penalty?
Order –
- The Single Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that if there is no intention to evade tax on the part of a person then imposition of tax and penalty is not proper and justified. But there must be some reasonable grounds to show that there was actually no intention to evade tax on the part of tax payer.
- The petitioner, in the present case, could not explain the absence of invoice and e-way bill with a proper and reasonable explanation. Ergo, he has not been able to rebut the presumption of evasion of tax. Mere furnishing of the documents subsequent to the interception can not be a valid ground to show that there was no intention to evade tax. There must be some reasonable grounds to justify the non-production of documents at the proper time.
- Hence, it was held that the petitioner herein has not complied with the provisions of law, hence the steps taken by the respondent authorities are proper and in accordance with the law and require no interference by this court. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation