GST – Calcutta High Court: Mere expiry of e-way bill without intent to evade tax, especially within 24 hours, does not justify a 200% penalty; Authorities must assess all facts, and only a notional penalty may be warranted in such cases [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
08-Aug-2025 21:44:36
Order dated 02 August 2025
Parties: M/s. Appollo Plywood Industries & Ors. Vs.the Assistant Commissioner of Revenue,
State Tax, & Ors
Facts –
- The appellants filed the writ petition challenging the order passed by the appellate authority WBGST/CGST Act, 2017(for brevity “the Act”). By the said order, the appellate authority confirmed the penalty imposed on the appellants i.e. Rs.7,31,661.00/- under Section 129 of the Act on the ground that the goods were being transported without a valid e-way bill were being transported without a valid e-way bill.
Issue –
- Whether the order passed by the appellate authority dated November 22, 2024 under Section 107 of the WBGST/CGST Act valid?
Order –
- The division bench of the Hon’ble High court held that the in the absence of any intent to evade payment of tax, in all cases where e-way bill has expired that too within less than 24 hours, the authority should take an informed decision and consider other aspects as well. In the instant case, the parties have not disputed any other document, nor the nature of the goods, nor its weight or any other documents concerning the vehicle in which the goods were being transported.
- Therefore, the Court was of the view that this is not a fit case where 200 per cent penalty should have been imposed on the appellants.
- However, for the default committed by the appellants, which resulted in the movement of the goods without a valid e-way bill on April 4, 2025 up to 3.10 p.m. would definitely warrant a notional penalty and not penalty @ 200 per cent.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation