GST – Calcutta High Court: Statutory authorities are not absolutely barred from condoning delays beyond one month from the prescribed period, as the petitioner has been able to sufficiently explain the delay in filing the appeal belatedly – Writ Petition allowed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
06-Mar-2025 12:54:38
Order Date – 14 February 2025
Parties: Green Filed Agrotech Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Facts –
- The Petitioner, Green Filed Agrotech, filed an appeal under Section 107 of the act on 15.05.2024 along with 10% pre-deposit of the disputed amount as required under the GST Act.
- The appeal was delayed by 42 days beyond the prescribed period, and the petitioner submitted an application for condonation of delay. The appeal was rejected on the ground that had no power to condone the delay beyond one month from the prescribed period under Section 107(4) of the WB GST Act.
Issue –
- Whether the Appellate Authority has the power to condone the delay beyond one month from the prescribed period?
Order –
- The Divisional Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that the appeal was obviously barred by limitation. However, at the same time, the aforesaid could not prevent the petitioner from maintaining an application for condonation of delay by invoking the provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
- Hence the Court was of view that the Appellate Authority ought to have taken note of the explanation given in the application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
- The petitioner has been able to sufficiently explain the delay in filing the appeal belatedly. In view thereof, Court restored the appeal to its original file and number and direct the Appellate Authority to hear out the same in accordance with law on merit.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation