GST – Delhi High Court: Appellate authorities have no power to condone delay beyond the prescribed extended period; appeal filed beyond the additional 1-month limit held time-barred – Strict adherence to limitation under CGST Act required [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
02-May-2025 14:09:05
Order Date – 07 February 2025
Parties: M/S ADDICHEM SPECIALLITY LLP Vs SPECIAL COMMISSIONER I, DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES AND ANR and others
Facts –
- The Petitioners, M/s Addichem Specillity LLP and others, were assessed by the respective adjudicating authorities which resulted in certain demands being raised against them and in some instances, their GST registrations being cancelled.
- Aggrieved by the cancellation of their GST registrations and the demands imposed, the petitioners filed statutory appeals before the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the CGST. However, those appeals were not entertained and were dismissed due to delay in filing.
- It was submitted that delay in filing appeals due to various reasons such as COVID-19, lack of proper notice, errors in SCNs, and non-consideration of their responses by the authorities.
Issue –
- Whether the Appellate Authority condone delays in filing appeals beyond the additional one-month period prescribed under Section 107(4) of the CGST Act, 2017?
Order –
- The Divisional Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that Sub-Section (4) of Section 107 of the CGST Act provides discretion to the Appellate Authority to entertain an appeal if it is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the appeal within the prescribed three-month period, provided the appeal is presented within an additional period of one month.
- It is well settled that once a statute prescribes a specific period of limitation, the Appellate Authority does not inherently hold any power to condone the delay in filing the appeal by invoking the provisions of Section 517 or 2918 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
- Once it is found that the legislation incorporates a provision which creates a special period of limitation and proscribes the same being entertained after a terminal date, the general provisions of the Limitation Act would cease to apply.
- Thus it is evident that each of the appeals was filed beyond the prescribed period of limitation provided by Sections 107 (1) and 107 (4) of the CGST Act, the aforesaid writ petitions lack merit and are accordingly dismissed.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation