GST – Gauhati High Court: Summary SCN issued in FORM GST DRC-01 does not substitute the proper SCN required under Section 73(1) - A formal and duly authenticated SCN is mandatorily [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
02-Aug-2025 21:32:04
Order Date – 31 July 2025
Parties: SHREEARIHANT LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS, THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
Facts –
- The Petitioner, ShreeariHant Logistics Pvt. Ltd, was served a summary of show cause notice (SCN) in Form GST DRC-01 without an attached, properly authenticated SCN or any mention of a hearing date.
- The Order in Form GST DRC-07 was passed solely on the grounds of non-payment within 30 days, without affording a proper opportunity of hearing or issuing a valid SCN under Section 73 of the CGST/State GST Acts.
Issue –
- Whether summary in GST DRC-01 without a properly authenticated and detailed show cause notice, and without opportunity of hearing, satisfies the requirements under Section 73 and 75(4) of GST Act?
Orders –
- The Single Bench of the Hon’ble High Court held that the Summary of the SCN issued in FORM GST DRC-01 does not substitute the proper SCN required under Section 73(1) of both the Central and State GST Acts. A formal and duly authenticated SCN is mandatorily required to initiate proceedings under Section 73. The Statement of tax determination under Section 73(3), which is attached to the summary in the present case cannot be treated as a valid SCN. Therefore, initiating proceedings solely based on such a statement is not in conformity with law.
- Court also noted that the impugned order contravenes Section 75(4)of the Act which mandates that a reasonable opportunity of hearing must be provided either when an adverse decision is contemplated or when a written request is made by the assessee. In the present case, although the DRC-01 summary specifies the date for filing a reply, it leaves the fields regarding the date and time of personal hearing as “NA”. In a situation where no reply is submitted, the Proper Officer cannot proceed to pass an adverse order without granting an opportunity of hearing, as doing so would render the safeguards under Section 75(4) ineffective and violate principles of natural justice.
- Accordingly, the impugned order dated 28.12.2023 was set aside. Further, the Court granted liberty to initiate de novo proceedings under Section 73, if considered appropriate.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation