GST – Gujarat High Court: Department is bound by the direction of Court and cannot reduce the interest from 7% to @ 6% on refund of IGST paid on exports – Writ petition allowed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
07-Jan-2024 21:47:05
Order Date – 07 December 2023
Parties: Real Prince Spntex Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India
Facts –
- The Petitioner, Real Prince Spntex Pvt Ltd, was sanctioned with the refund of IGST paid on exports without obtaining letter of undertaking with simple interest @7% by adjusting the differential duty drawback from the refund entitlement.
- However, the Deputy Commissioner of Customs passed the order pursuant to the directions of this Court and granted the refund by adjusting the differential duty drawback along with interest at the rate of 15% from the refund entitlement and further granted interest at the rate of 6% instead of 7% as directed by this Court.
Issue –
- Whether the charging interest at the rate of 15% on the differential duty drawback and reducing the interest @ 6% are proper?
Order –
- The Divisional Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that once the Court has issued the directions, the same are binding upon the respondent-authorities and the respondent-authorities had no reason to take a different view than the directions issued by the Court while exercising the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
- The respondent-authorities are bound by the directions issued by the Court and therefore, the impugned order is hereby, quashed and set aside. The respondent-authorities are directed to comply with the directions issued by this Court while sanctioning the refund of IGST after deducting the differential duty drawback with 7% simple interest as ordered by the Court.
- The writ petition is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation