GST – Gujarat High Court: When the appeal preferred is still pending before the Appellate Authority, the demand recovered from bank account of petitioner cannot be refunded by deducting pre-deposit of 10% of tax value – Writ petition disposed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
22-Jun-2023 14:05:04
Order Date – 15 June 2023
Parties: M/s Stallion Energy Private Limited Vs Union of India
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/s Stallion Energy Private Limited, is engaged in the business of supply of goods viz. coke and semi coke of coal.
- A show cause notice was issued which culminated into adjudication order. Thereafter order of provisional attachment of the property under Section 83 of the Act came to be passed on 16.06.2022. Out of the total amount of Rs.56,14,388, Rs.46 lakhs came to be withdrawn by the respondents from the bank account of petitioner maintained with HDFC Bank.
- The petitioner preferred an appeal and prayed to refund the amount of Rs.42,44,664/- to the petitioner after deducting the pre-deposit amount.
Issue –
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to refund of amount after deducting pre-deposit amount?
Order –
- The Divisional Bench of Hon’ble High observed that it is not in dispute that the petitioner preferred an appeal under Section 107 of the Act after the period of limitation i.e. after a period of three months. Along with the said appeal, petitioner has also preferred separate application for condonation of delay. The said proceedings are still pending before the Appellate Authority.
- It is the case of the petitioner that as per the provisions contained in section 107 of the Act, the petitioner is required to pre-deposit 10% of the amount of tax. However, it is prayed that the respondents be directed to refund the remaining amount of Rs.42,44,664/- to the petitioner.
- Such contention is misconceived in view of the provisions contained in Section 73(9) read with Sections 78 and 107 of the Act. If the appeal filed by the petitioner is allowed by the Appellate Authority, it is always open for the petitioner to make such request before the Appellate Authority that direction be issued to the respondents to refund the amount.
- The petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation