GST - Jharkhand High Court: Issue of adjustment of disputed interest liability by Revenue on irregular ITC availment against refund sanctioned to the Petitioner, without issue of show cause notice – Held that if any assessee disputes interest liability under Section 50 then revenue will have to follow procedure under Section 73 or 74: Petition allowed and directed revenue to initiate fresh proceedings [Order attached dated 18 August 2022]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
25-Aug-2022 07:39:59
Order date – 18 August 2022
Facts –
- The Petitioner, Bluestar Malleable Pvt. Ltd., submitted a declaration in form TRAN-1 as per section 140 of the JGST Act, 2017 with a claim of credit for a sum of Rs.3,11,43,255/-. The accountant of the petitioner company repeated the said claim of transitional credit for the same amount in the GSTR-3B furnished in July, 2017.
- In July, 2018 petitioner reversed the credit in GSTR-3B.
- The Petitioner has been called upon to pay interest for a sum of Rs.72,49,126/- vide letter dated 6th November 2018 on account of alleged irregular input tax credit taken by it.
- Petitioner has sought declaration that it is not liable to pay interest for such inadvertent mistake. Also, the credit was never utilized.
- Vide letter dated 28th January 2019 issued by the respondent whereby the objection of the petitioner against raising of the demand of interest under Section 50 of the JGST Act 2017 has been rejected.
- Petitioner’s one of the application cash refund was allowed, however, with an adjustment towards a sum of Rs.72,49,126/- in light of the impugned letter dated 06.11.2018. Petitioner challenged the part of refund order in appeal. The appeal was dismissed vide order dated 31.01.2020.
- Therefore, the Petitioner had sought a protection from taking coercive action against it.
Issue –
- Whether liability of interest under Section 50 of the JGST Act can be raised without initiating any adjudication proceeding either under Section 73 or 74 of the JGST Act in the event assessee has raised a dispute towards liability of interest?
Order –
- The Court briefly relied on the case of Mahadeo Construction Co. vs. Union of India, of this courtand held that if any assessee disputes the liability of interest under Section 50 of the JGST Act then the revenue will have to follow the specific procedure as stipulated under Section 73 or 74 of the JGST Act.
- Therefore the matter was remitted back to the revenue to initiate a fresh proceeding with regard to the liability towards interest under Section 50 of JGST Act in accordance with law as stipulated in JGST Act.
- And directed that after following the procedure and dependant on the proceedings, fresh refund order shall be issued in accordance with law.
- Writ Petition allowed by way of remand back.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation