GST – Jharkhand High Court: Summary of Show Cause Notice in form DRC-01 is not a substitute of section 74(1) Show Cause Notice - Power under the statute cannot be taken away by consent of the parties: Appeal Allowed.
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
22-Jul-2022 01:23:16
Order date – 27 June 2022
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/S Juhi Industries Pvt. Ltd., was being searched under Section 67 of the JGST Act for irregular claim of input tax credit mainly on the ground that the petitioner has claimed input tax credit without making payment of value and tax of the inputs to the supplier within six months which is in contravention of Section 16(2) of the JGST Act.
- The petitioner submits that the proceeding in both the cases started with issuance of summary show-cause notices dated 14.9.2018 u/s 74(1) of JGST Act, 2017. The petitioner under bona-fide and mistaken belief of law, submitted its concise reply in Form DRC-06 explaining that the ITC have been legally claimed by them and the goods have been physically received by them.
- The tax demand along with interest and penalty had been imposed on them.
- Revenue submitted that notice under Section 74(1) of JGST Act, 2017 i.e. summary of the show-cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 along with the gist of accusation was issued to the petitioner. Thereafter, petitioner furnished reply in Form GST DRC-06, which establishes the very fact that proper adjudication process was followed before passing of the impugned order in the both the writ applications.
- Aggrieved the Petition filed a writ petition.
Issue –
- Whether issuance of summary SCN does not fulfill the ingredients of a proper show cause notice?
Order –
- The Court observed that in view of the settled preposition of law, the foundation of the proceedings suffers from material irregularity and hence not sustainable being contrary to Section 74(1) of the JGST Act. Thus, the impugned Orders cannot sanctify the same.
- The Court further observed that a bonafide mistake or consent by the assesse cannot confer any jurisdiction upon the proper officer. The jurisdiction must flow from the statute itself. Court relied on the case of UOI Vs.Madhumilan Syntex Pvt.Ltd in which the Apex Court held that power under the statute cannot be taken away by consent of the parties.
- Therefore, impugned show cause notice does not fulfill the ingredients of a proper show cause notice and thus amounts to violation of principles of natural justice.
- Hence, the appeal was allowed and order was set aside.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation