GST – Kerala High Court: Assessee has collected the tax but failed to credit it to the Government within a period of thirty days of issue of notice- Sub-section 8 of Section 73 of the CGST Act will not have any effect as tax was not paid within 30 days of due, hence liable to pay penalty – Writ petition dismissed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
09-Nov-2023 22:51:14
Order Date – 17 October 2023
Parties: Ms Global Plasto Wares Vs Assistant State Tax Officer, The State Tax Officer and The Join Commissioner, State GST Department
Facts –
- The Petitioner, Ms Global Plasto Wares, received a notice dated 28.02.2022 and the petitioner has paid the tax on 10.03.2022.
- It was contented by the petitioner that as the tax along with the interest payable under Section 50 within a period of thirty days of issue of notice, no penalty shall be payable and all proceedings in respect of the said notice would be deemed to be concluded.
- However the department submitted that that Sub-section (8) of Section 73 comes into play when an assessee has not paid the tax on the transactions. But where the assessee has collected from the others and not credited it to the Government. Hence penalty is leviable.
Issue –
- Whether an assessee who had paid the tax within thirty dasy from the issue of notice along with interest would be held to be liable for penalty?
Order –
- The Single Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that the provisions of Sub-sections 6, 8 and 9 of Section 73 of the GST Act, 2017 provided that if a person chargeable to tax fails to deposit the tax collected by him within a period of thirty days from the due date of the payment of the such tax, Sub-section 8 will not have any effect and such a person is liable to pay penalty.
- Hence it was held that the Assessing Authority has taken the correct view in the matter and, therefore, no error of law which requires interference. Hence the present writ petition is dismissed.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation