GST – Kerala High Court: Denial of Input Tax Credit due to the late filing of GSTR-3B without considering extension of the deadline under Section 16(5) is legally unsustainable – Writ petition allowed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
13-Feb-2025 10:40:24
Order Date – 23 January 2025
Parties: Mellow Foundation Builders and Developers Pvt Ltd Vs Superintendent, Central Tax and Central Excise, Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN), Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Government of India
Facts –
- The petitioner, Mellow Foundation Builders and Developers Pvt Ltd, filed GSTR-3B for the period from November 2018 to March 2019 on 26.11.2019, whereas, as per Section 16(4), the deadline was 20.10.2019.
- An order was issued after denying the benefit of input tax credit on account of the provisions contained in sub-section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Act, due to the failure of the petitioner to file Form GSTR-3B within the time prescribed for the year 2018-19.
Issue –
- Whether the denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to the petitioner for the financial year 2018-19 due to the late filing of GSTR-3B was justified?
Order –
- The Single Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that after the introduction of Section 16(5), the time period for filing such returns has been extended upto 30.11.2021. If the return filed by the petitioner is taken into reckoning, there could be significant change in the appreciation of facts carried out in Ext.P1.
- In view of the above, the impugned order cannot be legally sustained, and it is required to be re-considered. Accordingly, impugned order is set aside and directed to pass fresh orders after taking note of the provisions contained in Section 16(5) of the CGST/SGST Act and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation