GST – Calcutta High Court: SCN adjudicated without opportunity for hearing or submission of written reply – Held that Petitioner has an adequate remedy under Section 107 to file appeal; hence, writ petition not maintainable [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
13-May-2025 23:26:26
Order Date – 10 February 2025
Parties: LGW Industries Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, State Tax & Ors.
Facts –
- The Petitioner, LGW Industries Limited, was served with a show cause notice under Section 74(1) for the period July, 2017 to March, 2018 allowing the chance to show cause why the RTP should not pay tax as ascertained after deducting the amount already paid voluntarily for the said period by 29.04.2024.
- It was submitted that the adjudication order was passed without giving an opportunity of hearing and without granting opportunity to file written notes of reply by the petitioner.
Issue –
- Whether the order issued under section 74 is appealable in the High Court when there is a clear and adequate remedy available for grievance?
Order –
- The Single Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that an order passed under Section 74 of the GST Act is appealable under Section 107A of the said Act. The above Section categorically states that there is a statutory mechanism for redressal enabling the aggrieved party to challenge the reassessment order before an appropriate appellate authority. This Court underlines that this statutory provision ensures that the petitioner has a clear and adequate remedy available for his grievance.
- Further it was held that when a specific remedy is available, a well settled principle of law that the High Court’s writ jurisdiction cannot be ordinarily invoked unless under exceptional circumstances. In the present case, as the petitioner could not demonstrate any exceptional circumstances and has adequate relief by way of preferring an appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act and there arises no need for judicial intervention through a writ petition at this stage.
- The writ petition disposed of.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation