GST- Madras High Court: No useful purpose will be served by keeping the Petitioners out of the GST regime, as such assessee would still continue to do business and supply goods/services – Impugned Order cancelling the GST registration is set aside.


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
01-Aug-2022 07:17:52
Order Date – 27 July 2022
Facts –
- The Petitioner, Tvl. Jeyalakhsmi Store, was served with a notice dated 04.01.2021, for cancellation of registration of GST.
- The petitioner asserts that due to the Covid-19 pandemic and nation-wide lock down, the petitioner's business was shut down and thus he did not file monthly returns.
- He further submits that his registration was cancelled in the month of May of 2022 when his private accountant accessed the GSTN. Subsequently, he filed the pending returns for the month up to August 2022 and since there were no business, he filed nil returns.
- The petitioner attempted to file a representation to revoke the cancellation of registration, the same was rejected on grounds that it was not filed within the statutory limitation of 90 (30+60) days.
- Aggrieved, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition.
Issue –
- Whether the cancellation of GST registration due to non-filing of monthly returns owing to no business justifiable?
Order –
- The High Court observed that it will serve no useful purpose by keeping the Petitioner out of the Goods and Services tax regime. Majorly relying on Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Vs Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST) and others – Madrad High Court, which is quite similar to the case of the petitioner and the Court condoned the delay.
- The Court further observed that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the Petitioners out of the Goods and Services Tax regime, as such assessee would still continue to do business and supply goods/services. By not bringing them back to the Goods and Services Tax fold/regime, would not further the interest of the revenue.
- The Writ Petition was allowed subject to certain conditions and directed the Petitioner to file returns for the period prior to the cancellation of registration, with tax defaulted along with interest and fine and fee fixed for belated filing of returns for the defaulted within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation