GST – New Delhi High Court: Petitioner had already complied with the requirement of filing the returns on the date when the order cancelling its registration was passed and, therefore, the said order was unsustainable - For the purpose of calculating any penalty for the late filing of the returns, the period is liable to be excluded – Petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
01-Apr-2023 19:21:35
Order date – 24 March 2023
Parties – M/s. Bhagwati Trading Co. Vs Union of India & Ors.
Facts –
- The petitioner, M/s. BHAGWATI TRADING CO., had not filed its GST returns for more than six months, leading to the cancellation of its GSTIN registration by an order dated 29.07.2020.
- The petitioner filed an application for revocation of the cancellation of its GSTIN registration, which was rejected by an order dated 14.12.2020 for the sole reason that the petitioner had not responded to the Show Cause Notice dated 27.10.2020.
- The Writ Petition is filed to set aside the penalty of Rs.2,32,014/- imposed upon of the petitioner.
Issue –
- Since the petitioner had already complied with the requirement of filing the returns on the date when the order cancelling its registration was passed and, therefore, the said order was unsustainable.
Order –
- The Court has observed that order dated 14.12.2020, rejecting the petitioner’s application for revocation of cancellation of GSTIN registration is unsustainable. It provides no reason as to why the petitioner’s application was rejected.
- Further, it is hard to accept that there could be any meaningful response to the said Show Cause Notice. It sets out no reason at all for proposing to reject the petitioner’s application for revocation of cancellation.
- Hence, the order dated 14.12.2020, rejecting the petitioner’s application for revocation of cancellation of GSTIN registration, is unsustainable.
- The Court has directed that the petitioner’s penalty for late filing of GST returns be waived off since the reason for non-filing was the cancellation of its registration, which was subsequently revoked.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation