Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Appellant happen to be a charitable trust and held a belief that they are not a "Commercial‟ Training or Coaching Centre and therefore, did not discharge the service tax, hence invoking extended period of limitation is not justified – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
27-Sep-2023 10:17:49
Order Date – 22 September 2023
Parties: Sophisticated Instrumentation vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara
Facts –
- The Appellant, Sophisticated Instrumentation, is managed by Charutar Vidya Mandal, a non-profit organization registered as a public charitable trust. They provide training facilities to students of the Institute of Science and Technology and Charutar Vidya Mandal.
- A Demand of service tax was confirmed against the appellant under the head” "Commercial Training or Coaching Service" for the period 2006-2007.
Issue –
- Whether the appellant falls under the definition of a "Commercial Training or Coaching Centre" for the purpose of service tax?
Order –
- The Tribunal observing the definition and explanation of Commercial Training and Coaching Centre found that prior to 2010, there was a confusion regarding the nature of institute which are covered under the definition of Commercial Training or Coaching Centre.
- In the instant case, the appellant happens to be a charitable trust and held a belief that they are not a “Commercial” Training or Coaching Centre and therefore, did not discharge the service tax.
- In these circumstances, invocation of extended period of limitation is not justified. The impugned order is, therefore, set aside and appeal is allowed on the ground of limitation.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation