Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Banking charges were deducted by Indian Bank on remitting the proceeds from foreign buyer by the foreign bank - The dealing of banking activity is strictly between the foreign bank and Indian bank; Indian bank is liable to pay service tax not the assessee under reverse charge – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
01-Jul-2024 10:38:21
Order Date – 05 June 2024
Parties: GRP Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Bharuch
Facts –
- The Appellant, GRP Limited, was issued with a show cause notice proposing to demand of Service Tax on the ground that the assessee is liable for making payment of Service Tax on the foreign bank charges.
- The demand was confirmed. The appellant preferred appeal.
Issue –
- Whether the assessee is liable for making payment of Service Tax on the foreign bank charges?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that the appellant had no dealing or contract or agreement with the foreign bank. The appellant have received the proceed from foreign buyer and while remitting payment by the foreign bank to Indian bank, certain banking charges were deducted.
- Since the dealing of banking activity is strictly between the foreign bank and Indian bank, at the most, any taxable service involve, it is between the foreign bank and the Indian bank and Indian bank is liable to pay service tax. As per the submission of the appellant, the Indian bank has discharged service tax and collected from the appellant.
- In view of the judgment in Raymond Limited vs. CCE and the facts of the present case, the issue is no longer res-integra. Accordingly, the demand in the present case is not sustainable hence, the impugned order is set-aside, appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation