Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Corporate Guarantee by the Appellant is merely an act of providing an instrument for securing loans and not even fundamentally connected to the services as described under Business Support services - No merit in demanding tax – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
30-Apr-2024 10:56:11
Order Date – 05 April 2024
Parties: M/s Essar Power Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Surat-i
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s Essar Power Ltd, is a limited company and is primarily engaged in the generation of electricity. The appellant executed two corporate guarantees dated 10.01.2008 and07.01.2010 on behalf of Loop Telecom Pvt. Ltd and Loop Mobile Holdings India Ltd. for securing loans, in favour of State Bank of India.
- The appellant was issued show cause notice based on an investigation undertaken by DGCEI, Ahmedabad zonal unit demanding service tax on the Guarantee Commission received by the Appellant by classifying it under the head of Business Support Services. The demand has been confirmed.
Issue –
- Whether service tax is liable to be discharged on the Guarantee Commission received for furnishing Corporate Guarantee under the heading “business support services‟?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that the execution of Corporate Guarantee by the Appellant is merely an act of providing an instrument for securing loans and not even fundamentally connected to the services as described under Business Support services which includes those services to the tune of transaction processing, routine administration or accountancy, customer relationship management and tele-marketing which in its nature of extension includes those that are outsourced only to be interpreted within its scope for the purpose of levy of tax.
- Therefore, no merit can be found that the commission so received on such corporate guarantee by the Appellant will become eligible for taxation under the scope of Section 65 (104c) of the Finance Act, 1994. Hence the appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation