Service tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Delay should have been condoned as refund application was filed within 30 days, after stipulated period of 60 days - Corporations constituted under the act of State Government are “governmental authority”, hence are eligible for exemption on service of Construction, Erection etc. of residential complex pre-dominantly meant for use of their employees: Appeal allowed [Order Attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
16-Aug-2022 11:34:13
Order date – 12 August 2022
Facts –
- The Appellant, Kanubhai Ramjibhai Makwana, have filed refund claim for an amount of Rs.22,77,511/- on 11.11.2016 before the Assistant Commissioner under Section 102 of the Finance Act, 1994.
- The adjudicating authority rejected the refund amounting of Rs.18,13,698/- on the ground that under the Provision of Section 102(1)(a), it is clear that the exemption applicable only when service is provided to Government, local authority or Governmental authority by way of Construction, Erection, Commissioning, Installing, Fitting out, Repair and maintenance, renovation of residential complex pre-dominantly meant for self use or for use of their employees.
- It was contended by the adjudicating authority that the claimant had provided the services to M/s. Gujarat State Police Housing Corporation Ltd. (GSPHCL) is a company and not a Governmental Authority. Hence, the exemption is not applicable. Also, the refund was rejected on ground of limitation.
- Aggrieved the appellant filed an appeal.
Issue –
- Whether the Commissioner was right in rejecting the appeal on limitation and whether the services provided by the appellant to GSPHCL falls under the category of services provided to government or governmental authority and eligible for exemption under Section 102 of the Finance Act, 1994?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that once the appellant have filed a condonation of delay application where delay is well within period of 30 days after stipulated period of 60 days, the Commissioner (Appeals) should have taken a lenient view and should have condoned the delay, accordingly, the order of rejection on time bar is not sustainable.
- Relying on Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Thanjavur Vs. Principal Chief Commissioner of GSt & C.Ex., Chennai the Tribunal was further of the view that even the corporation/board constituted under the act of State Government should be considered as a governmental authority.
- And since the GSPHCL is a 100% owned by Government of Gujarat, the exemption provided to the government or governmental authority is applicable in respect of service provided by appellant to GSPHCL.
- The order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation