Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Any amount provided by Gujarat Maritime Board, the appellant herein, is a State levy and a statutory levy and proceeds of such levy are credited to the Consolidated Treasury Fund of State of Gujarat - No Service tax liability on statutory levy – Appeal allowed [Order attached]
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
27-Sep-2023 10:09:20
Order Date – 22 September 2023
Parties: Gujarat Maritime Board vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-BHAVNAGAR
Facts –
- The Appellant, Gujarat Maritime Board, are part of Government of Gujarat. During the period 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10 the appellants recovered certain amounts from the various ship breakers to whom they had allotted plots at Alang for the purpose of ship breaking.
- Demands were raised against them to recover service tax on all this charges however, the demand was confirmed only in respect of recoveries made against plot development charges.
Issue –
- Whether the appellant is liable to pay service tax on recoveries made against plot development charges?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that from the letter dated 29.12.2009 of appellant, it is apparent that the appellant had a view that the collection made under the head of “user development fee” is not in respect of any service and the said amount collected by them is not liable to payment of service tax. Their views were clearly communicated to the office of DGCEI and no show cause notice under the said head was issued by the office of DGCEI to the appellant.
- In this background, issuance of show cause notice on 10.04.2013 demanding service tax on this very amount of “user development fee” is clearly barred by limitation. There was no suppression or intention to evade payment of duty as the appellant had clearly disclosed the fact regarding collection of said user development fee as well as their views about non-taxability of the same to the department way back in 29.12.2009.
- Appellant have clearly stated that no services is provided by them to the allotees for plots to ship breaking and therefore, the amount collected by them cannot be called “port service‟.
- Hence the appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation