Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Printing may or may not amount to manufacture, but it cannot be denied that the activity of printing is an activity of production – Exempted allowed – Appeal allowed [Order attached]
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
04-May-2023 13:27:17
Order Date – 03 May 2023
Parties: Decorative Sleeves Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-ii
Facts –
- The Appellant, Decorative Sleeves Pvt Ltd, undertook job work from three different parties. The job work involved printing on PVC films supplied by their clients. The appellants collected job charges.
- The department sought to tax the receipt of the job work charges under the head of Business Auxiliary Service. The same was confirmed holding that that the activity of printing does not amount to manufacture and therefore, the appellants are not entitled to benefit of Notification No. 14/2004-ST.
Issue –
- Whether Job work charges are taxable under the head of Business Auxiliary Service?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that Notification No. 14/2004-S. T., dated 10-9-2004 exempts production of goods on behalf of client and any service incidental or ancillary to production of goods.
- In the instant case, it is not in dispute that the appellants are printing on PVC material supplied by their clients. Printing may or may not amount to manufacture, but it cannot be denied that the activity of printing is an activity of production. In these circumstances benefit of Notification No. 14/2004-ST, as amended cannot be denied to the appellant.
- The notification not only covers the activity of production of goods but also any activity incidental or ancillary to production of goods. In these circumstances the activity of printing on PVC done by the appellant can be considered to be activity of production of goods.
- The appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation