Service Tax – Cestat Chennai: Forfeiture of earnest money deposit and liquidated damages received towards “consideration” for “tolerating an act” is not leviable to Service tax – Appeal allowed [Order attached]
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
27-Apr-2023 16:38:48
Order Date – 26 April 2023
Parties: M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited Vs The Commissioner of G.S.T and Central Excise
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, is a public sector undertaking engaged in the manufacture of heavy engineering equipment such as boiler and boiler components and is also engaged in the service of erection / commissioning of power plants / projects.
- A show cause notice was issued alleging that during the period from July 2012 to June 2017, the appellant is charging and recovering Liquidated Damages for delay in supply and service contract as per the written agreements between them but did not pay the Service Tax on it
Issue –
- Whether the Liquidated Damages received by the appellant would be liable to Service Tax?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that the similar issue of the assessee has been settled in the favour of the assessee.
- In the order in the case of M/s. South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. the Learned Delhi Bench has analysed the scope and ambit of Sections 65B (44), 66E (e) and 67 (1) of the Act and they have also analysed and applied various decisions of the Hon’ble Apex Court and thereafter, has concluded that the view of the Principal Commissioner therein that the penalty amount, forfeiture of earnest money deposit and liquidated damages received by the appellant therein towards “consideration” for “tolerating an act” as being amenable to Service Tax under Section 66E (e) of the Finance Act, was not sustainable.
- Thus, the impugned order cannot sustain, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation