Service Tax – Cestat Hyderabad: Reimbursable expenses cannot be included in the gross value for the purpose of levy of service tax as Rule 5 has been held to be ultra virus, and as such provision is no longer applicable – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
04-Dec-2023 10:29:44
Order Date – 01 December 2023
Parties: R & A Associates Vs Commissioner of Central Tax, Secunderabad - GST
Facts –
- The Appellant, R & A Associates, providing services of Company Secretary in terms of Section 65(85) of Finance Act, 1994.
- The department on scrutiny of records observed that they are not showing certain expenses like, conveyance, courier charges, miscellaneous expenses, stationery charges and travelling expenses etc., in their ST- 3 returns.
- A show cause notice was issued to the appellant demanding tax along with interest and penalty alleging that these expenses are deductable from the gross receipt for arriving at the assessable value.
Issue –
- Whether the amount received by the Appellants from their clients in respect of certain expenses on actual basis needs to be included in the gross value charged for the purpose of levy of service tax?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that the expenses incurred by the Appellants were not being reimbursed on the actual basis by the client. On the contrary, the Appellants have submitted that these were being reimbursed by the clients on the actual basis for which they were issuing debit notes, and not invoice.
- Therefore, the nature of the expenses / cost is nothing but reimbursable expense / cost. The provision under which such expense / costs were proposed to be included i.e. Rule 5 has been held to be ultra virus, and as such provision is no longer applicable and therefore such reimbursable expenses cannot be included in the gross value charged even by invoking Section 67. It is only after the amendment in the definition of consideration in 2015, such reimbursement can be included in the gross value charged.
- The demand cannot be sustained and therefore the Order of the Commissioner (Appeals) is set aside, and appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation