Service Tax – Cestat Kolkata: Appeal filed after more than 43 months, 40 months and 37 months, way beyond the condonable period of three months - There is no power vested with the Tribunal, High Court and Supreme Court to condone this delay of more than 30 / 90 days occurring before the Commissioner (Appeals) – Appeal dismissed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
29-Dec-2023 12:04:47
Order Date – 22 December 2023
Parties: M/s. LGW Ltd. Vs Commr. of Service Tax & Central Excise, Kolkata
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s. LGW Ltd., had filed an Appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was dismissed by him on the ground that the Appeals were filed much beyond the condonable period power available to him.
Issue –
- Whether the appeal filed beyond the condonable period is maintainable?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that the appellant have filed the Appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals), after more than 43 months, 40 months and 37 months, way beyond the condonable period of Three Months by the Commissioner (Appeals) as prescribed under Section 85 (3).
- Therefore, when admittedly the Appeals have been filed beyond 3 months + 3 months, there are no infirmity has crept in, in the OIAs passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). It was held by the Tribunal that he was correct in dismissing the Appeals on this count.
- The Tribunal relying on the various judgments of Hon’ble Supreme Courts, observed that, it is crystal clear that Commissioner (Appeals) has no power to condone the delay beyond 30 days / 90 days. The judgments affirm and approve the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals). Further as held by Supreme Court, there is no power vested with the Tribunal, High Court and Supreme Court to condone this delay of more than 30 / 90 days occurring before the Commissioner (Appeals).
- Hence the appeal is dismissed.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation